<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:wbfeed="http://www.worldbank.org/isp/"><wbfeed:name>Energy</wbfeed:name><wbfeed:date>Wed Jun 19 22:00:14 EDT 2013</wbfeed:date><wbfeed:host>w1es1000.worldbank.org</wbfeed:host><title type="text">Policy Research Working Paper | Energy | World Bank</title><link href="http://econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/0,,menuPK:577938~pagePK:64165265~piPK:64165423~theSitePK:469372,00.html"></link><subtitle type="html">Policy Research Working Paper on Energy, from the World Bank</subtitle><entry><title type="text">Oil price risks and pump price adjustments</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20121015132748&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">Between 1999 and 2008, world oil prices more than quadrupled in real terms. For oil importers, vulnerability to oil price increases, defined as the share of gross domestic product spent on net oil imports, rose considerably. Considering medians, low-income countries had the highest vulnerability in 2008 and the highest increase in vulnerability between 1999 and 2008. When changes in vulnerability were decomposed into several contributing factors, more than two-thirds of 170 countries studied were found to have offset the increase in the value of oil consumption by reducing the oil intensity of gross domestic product. Oil intensity fell in more than half the countries in every income group and in every region of the world, driven by falling energy intensity and, to a lesser extent, the oil share of energy. This study also examines the degree of pass-through to consumers of increases in world prices of gasoline, diesel, kerosene, and liquefied petroleum gas between January 2009 and January 2012, when oil prices in nominal U.S. dollars more than doubled. Retail fuel prices varied by two orders of magnitude in 2012, and oil-exporting countries were far less likely to pass on price increases. Gasoline had the highest pass-through, followed by diesel, liquefied petroleum gas, and kerosene. The median pass-through increased with income for gasoline, diesel, and kerosene, but was highest in low-income countries for liquefied petroleum gas. Despite divergent pricing policies, the pass-through coefficients of different fuels were strongly positively correlated, suggesting that the degrees to which domestic prices tracked world prices were comparable for the four fuels in many countries. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20121015132748&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2012-10-15T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2012-10-15T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Industry|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Energy Production and Transportation|Markets and Market Access|Oil Refining &amp; Gas Industry|Energy and Environment|Environment and Energy Efficiency</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Kojima, Masami</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Oil price risks and pump price adjustments</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Industry|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Energy Production and Transportation|Markets and Market Access|Oil Refining &amp; Gas Industry|Energy and Environment|Environment and Energy Efficiency</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6227</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Development of biofuels in China : technologies, economics and policies</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20121017152604&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">China promulgated the Medium and Long-Term Development Plan for Renewable Energy in 2007, which included targets of 2010 and 2020 for various renewable energy technologies including biofuels. The 2010 biofuel targets were met and even surpassed except for non-grain fuel ethanol; however, there is debate on whether and how the country will be able to meet the 2020 biofuels target. This paper provides a resource and technological assessment of biofuel feedstocks, compares biofuel production costs from various feddstocks and technologies, and evaluates policies introduced in the country for the development of biofuels. The paper also presents the projections on the production of biofuels under various policy scenarios. The study shows that China can potentially satisfy its non-grain fuel ethanol target by 2020 from the technology perspective. But it will probably fall far short of this target without additional fiscal incentives as production costs of non-grain feedstock based biofuels are expected to remain relatively high. By contrast, the 2020 target of biodiesel production has a high probability of being achieved because the target itself is relatively small. With additional support policies, it could develop even further.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20121017152604&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2012-10-17T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2012-10-17T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Environment|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Energy Production and Transportation|Renewable Energy|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Energy and Environment|Environment and Energy Efficiency</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>East Asia and Pacific</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Shiyan, Chang|Lili, Zhao|Timilsina, Govinda R.|Xiliang, Zhang</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Development of biofuels in China : technologies, economics and policies</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>China</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Environment|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Energy Production and Transportation|Renewable Energy|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Energy and Environment|Environment and Energy Efficiency</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6243</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>China</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>East Asia and Pacific</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Green industrial policy : trade and theory</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20121022144357&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">This paper studies the reality and the potential for green industrial policy. It provides a summary of the green industrial policies, broadly understood, for five countries. It then considers the relation between green industrial policies and trade disputes, emphasizing the Brazil-United States dispute involving ethanol and the broader United States-China dispute. The theory of public policy provides many lessons for green industrial policy. The authors highlight four of these lessons, involving the Green Paradox, the choice of quantities versus prices with endogenous investment, the coordination issues arising from emissions control, and the ability of green industrial policies to promote cooperation in reducing a global public bad like carbon emissions.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20121022144357&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2012-10-22T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2012-10-22T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Climate Change Economics|Environmental Economics &amp; Policies|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Energy Production and Transportation|Economic Theory &amp; Research</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region|Rest Of The World|Latin America &amp; Caribbean|East Asia and Pacific</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Karp, Larry|Stevenson, Megan</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Green industrial policy : trade and theory</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World|United States|Brazil|China</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Climate Change Economics|Environmental Economics &amp; Policies|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Energy Production and Transportation|Economic Theory &amp; Research</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6238</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World|United States|Brazil|China</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region|Rest Of The World|Latin America &amp; Caribbean|East Asia and Pacific</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">The cost structure of the clean development mechanism</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20121113115028&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">This paper examines the cost of producing emission reduction credits under the Clean Development Mechanism. Using project-specific data, cost functions are estimated using alternative functional forms. The results show that, in general, the distribution of projects in the pipeline does not correspond exclusively to the cost of generating anticipated credits. Rather, investment choices appear to be influenced by location and project type considerations in a way that is consistent with variable transaction costs and investor preferences among hosts and classes of projects. This implies that comparative advantage based on the marginal cost of abatement is only one of several factors driving Clean Development Mechanism investments. This is significant since much of the conceptual and applied numerical literature concerning greenhouse gas mitigation policies relies on presumptions about relative abatement costs. The authors also find that Clean Development Mechanism projects generally exhibit constant or increasing returns to scale. In contrast, they find variations among classes of projects concerning economies of time.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20121113115028&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2012-11-13T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2012-11-13T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Environment|Transport|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Climate Change Economics|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Energy Production and Transportation|Transport Economics Policy &amp; Planning|Energy and Environment</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Rahman, Shaikh M.|Larson, Donald F.|Dinar, Ariel</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>The cost structure of the clean development mechanism</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Environment|Transport|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Climate Change Economics|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Energy Production and Transportation|Transport Economics Policy &amp; Planning|Energy and Environment</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6262</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Emissions trading with offset markets and free quota allocations</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20121129115653&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">This paper studies interactions between a "policy bloc's" emissions quota market and an offset market where emissions offsets can be purchased from a non-policy "fringe" of countries (such as for the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol). Policy-bloc firms enjoy free quota allocations, updated according to either past emissions or past outputs. Both overall abatement and the allocation of given abatement between the policy bloc and the fringe are then inefficient. When the policy-bloc quota and offset markets are fully integrated, firms buying offsets from the fringe, and all quotas and offsets, must be traded at a single price; the policy bloc will either not constrain the offset market whatsoever, or ban offsets completely. These cases occur when free allocation of quotas is less (very) generous, and the offset market delivers large (small) quota amounts. Governments of policy countries would instead prefer to buy offsets directly from the fringe at a price below the policy-bloc quota price. The offset price is then below the marginal damage cost of emissions and the quota price in the policy bloc is above the marginal damage cost. This is also inefficient as the policy bloc, acting as a monopsonist, purchases too few offsets from the fringe.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20121129115653&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2012-11-29T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2012-11-29T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Climate Change Economics|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Markets and Market Access|Energy Production and Transportation|Carbon Policy and Trading</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Rosendahl, Knut Einar|Strand, Jon</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Emissions trading with offset markets and free quota allocations</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Climate Change Economics|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Markets and Market Access|Energy Production and Transportation|Carbon Policy and Trading</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6281</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Climate change policies and employment in Eastern Europe and Central Asia</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20121217101057&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">This paper analyzes the differential impact of climate change policies on employment in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. In particular, the paper examines (i) how vulnerable labor markets are in Eastern European and Central Asian countries to future carbon regulation, and (ii) what countries can do to mitigate some of the potential negative effects of these regulatory changes on employment. In many aspects, the nature of the shock associated with climate regulation is similar to that associated with an increase in energy prices. Constraints on carbon emissions put a price on climate-damaging activities and make hydrocarbon-based energy production and consumption more expensive. As a result, firms in energy-intensive industries may react to higher energy prices by reducing production, which in turn would lead to lower employment. In the presence of frictions in labor markets, these sector shifts will cause resources to be unemployed, at least in the short term. Using principal component analysis, the paper finds that Eastern European and Central Asian countries vary greatly in their vulnerability and adaptability of employment to carbon regulation. Since the economy takes time to adjust, policy-makers will need to ensure that the incentives are there for new firms to emerge and employ workers, and that workers have the skills to respond to that demand. Moreover, governments have a role to play in ensuring that workers that are displaced have a proper safety net that will not only help in protecting their welfare, but will also allow workers to make more efficient labor market transitions.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20121217101057&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2012-12-17T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2012-12-17T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Social Protections and Labor|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Labor Markets|Energy Production and Transportation|Markets and Market Access|Labor Policies|Climate Change Economics</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>Europe and Central Asia</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Oral, Isil|Santos, Indhira|Zhang, Fan</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Climate change policies and employment in Eastern Europe and Central Asia</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>Europe and Central Asia</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Social Protections and Labor|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Labor Markets|Energy Production and Transportation|Markets and Market Access|Labor Policies|Climate Change Economics</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6294</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>Europe and Central Asia</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>Europe and Central Asia</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">How fit are feed-in tariff policies ? evidence from the European wind market</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130227084149&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">Feed-in tariffs have become the most widely used policy instrument to promote renewable energy deployment around the world. This paper examines the relation between tariff setting and policy outcome based on wind capacity expansion in 35 European countries over the 1991-2010 period. Using a dynamic panel data model, it estimates the long-run elasticity of wind deployment with respect to the level of feed-in support. The analysis finds that higher subsidies do not necessarily yield greater levels of wind installation. Non-economic barriers and rent-seeking may have contributed to the weak correlation. On the other hand, the length of feed-in contract and guaranteed grid access are important determinants of policy effectiveness. A one-year extension of an original 5-year agreement on average increases wind investment by 6 percent annually, while providing an interconnection guarantee almost doubles wind investment in one year.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130227084149&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-02-27T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-02-27T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Energy Production and Transportation|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Carbon Policy and Trading|Climate Change Economics|Markets and Market Access</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>Europe and Central Asia</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Zhang, Fan</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>How fit are feed-in tariff policies ? evidence from the European wind market</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>Europe</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Energy Production and Transportation|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Carbon Policy and Trading|Climate Change Economics|Markets and Market Access</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6376</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>Europe</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>Europe and Central Asia</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Impact evaluation of free-of-charge CFL bulb distribution in Ethiopia</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130313132456&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">Electricity infrastructure is one of the most important development challenges in Africa. While more resources are clearly needed to invest in new capacities, it is also important to promote energy efficiency and manage the increasing demand for power. This paper evaluates one of the recent energy-efficiency programs in Ethiopia, which distributed 350,000 compact fluorescent lamp bulbs free of charge. The impact related to this first phase is estimated at about 45 to 50 kilowatt hours per customer per month, or about 13.3 megawatts of energy savings in total. The overall impact of the compact fluorescent lamp bulb programs, thanks to which more than 5 million bulbs were distributed, could be significantly larger. The paper also finds that the majority of the program beneficiaries were low-volume customers -- mostly from among the poor -- although the program was not targeted. In addition, the analysis determines the distributional effect of the program: the energy savings relative to the underlying energy consumption were larger for the poor. The evidence also supports a rebound effect. About 20 percent of the initial energy savings disappeared within 18 months of the program's completion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130313132456&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-03-13T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-03-13T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Energy Production and Transportation|Climate Change Economics|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Energy and Environment|Environment and Energy Efficiency</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>Africa</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Costolanski, Peter|Elahi, Raihan|Iimi, Atsushi|Kitchlu, Rahul</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Impact evaluation of free-of-charge CFL bulb distribution in Ethiopia</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>Ethiopia</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Energy Production and Transportation|Climate Change Economics|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Energy and Environment|Environment and Energy Efficiency</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6383</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>Ethiopia</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>Africa</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">The energy transition of the transition economies : an empirical analysis</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130319085959&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">The aggregate manufacturing energy intensity of 28 countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia had declined by 35 percent during 1998-2008. This study reveals strong evidence of convergence: less efficient countries improved more rapidly and the cross-country variance in energy productivity narrowed over time. An index decomposition analysis indicates that energy intensities declined largely because of more efficient energy use rather than shifts from energy intensive to less intensive manufacturing activities. Income growth and energy price increases were the main drivers of the convergence. They dominated the impact of trade, which led to specialization in energy intensive industries. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130319085959&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-03-19T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-03-19T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Energy Production and Transportation|Environment and Energy Efficiency|Energy and Environment|Energy Demand|Climate Change Economics</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>Europe and Central Asia</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Zhang, Fan</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>The energy transition of the transition economies : an empirical analysis</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>Europe and Central Asia</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Energy Production and Transportation|Environment and Energy Efficiency|Energy and Environment|Energy Demand|Climate Change Economics</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6387</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>Europe and Central Asia</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>Europe and Central Asia</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Political economy aspects of fuel subsidies : a conceptual framework</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130327085717&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">While notoriously inefficient, fuel subsidies are widespread, and in many cases politically stable. This paper discusses and models various political economy aspects of fuel subsidies, focusing on gasoline and kerosene. Both economic and political are considered to explain differences in subsidies, with particular focus on democratic and autocratic governments. A political process is modeled whereby a promise of low fuel prices is used in democracies to attract voters, and in autocracies to mobilize support among key groups. Subsidies to fuels are viewed as either easier to observe, easier to commit to, easier to deliver, or better targeted at core groups, than other public goods or favors offered by rulers. Easier commitment and delivery than for regular public goods can explain the high prevalence of such policies in autocracies, and also in young democracies where the capacity to commit to or deliver complex public goods is not yet fully developed. The analysis provides a framework for empirical testing and verification.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130327085717&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-03-27T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-03-27T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Transport|Public Sector Development|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Transport Economics Policy &amp; Planning|Economic Theory &amp; Research|Energy Production and Transportation|Transport and Environment|Public Sector Economics</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Strand, Jon</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Political economy aspects of fuel subsidies : a conceptual framework</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Transport|Public Sector Development|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Transport Economics Policy &amp; Planning|Economic Theory &amp; Research|Energy Production and Transportation|Transport and Environment|Public Sector Economics</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6392</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Petroleum product pricing and complementary policies: experience of 65 developing countries since 2009</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130401160010&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">Unable to cope fully with steadily climbing world oil prices since mid-2009, many of the 65 countries reviewed in this paper have progressed slowly or even reversed course in reforming pricing of petroleum products. End-user prices in July 2012 varied by two orders of magnitude across the countries. More than two-fifths, including some that had only recently adopted automatic pricing mechanisms, froze the prices of gasoline, diesel, or both for months or even years on end during the study period. When the prices were finally adjusted, the increases were sometimes substantial, leading to large-scale protests, partial or full reversals of price adjustments, or softening of pricing reform policy. Governments' attempts to keep domestic prices artificially low -- through price control, export or quantity restrictions, or political pressure put on oil companies -- have helped curb inflation in the short term, but frequently with serious negative consequences: flourishing black markets, smuggling, fuel adulteration, illegal diversion of subsidy funds, large financial losses suffered by fuel suppliers, deteriorating refining and other infrastructure, and acute fuel shortages causing economy-wide damage. In several countries, subsidies, price controls, and other restrictions have helped protect inefficient refineries and oil marketers. Mitigation responses have included fuel conservation programs; fuel diversification, particularly liquid biofuels to substitute gasoline and diesel; and efforts to lower costs of supply, including strengthening infrastructure, promoting price competition, hedging, negotiating price discounts with exporters, and bulk procurement. Various forms of assistance to consumers have also been offered, especially to households, agriculture, transport, and fisheries. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130401160010&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-04-01T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-04-01T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Transport|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Industry|International Economics and Trade|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Energy Production and Transportation|Markets and Market Access|Transport Economics Policy &amp; Planning|Oil Refining &amp; Gas Industry|Access to Markets</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Kojima, Masami</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Petroleum product pricing and complementary policies: experience of 65 developing countries since 2009</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Transport|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Industry|International Economics and Trade|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Energy Production and Transportation|Markets and Market Access|Transport Economics Policy &amp; Planning|Oil Refining &amp; Gas Industry|Access to Markets</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6396</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Energy intensive infrastructure investments with retrofits in continuous time : effects of uncertainty on energy use and carbon emissions</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130430090534&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">Energy-intensive infrastructure may tie up fossil energy use and carbon emissions for a long time after investments, making the structure of such investments crucial for society. Much or most of the resulting carbon emissions can often be eliminated later, through a costly retrofit. This paper studies the simultaneous decision to invest in such infrastructure, and retrofit it later, in a model where future climate damages are uncertain and follow a geometric Brownian motion process with positive drift. It shows that greater uncertainty about climate cost (for given unconditional expected costs) then delays the retrofit decision by increasing the option value of waiting to invest. Higher energy intensity is also chosen for the initial infrastructure when uncertainty is greater. These decisions are efficient given that energy and carbon prices facing the decision maker are (globally) correct, but inefficient when they are lower, which is more typical. Greater uncertainty about future climate costs will then further increase lifetime carbon emissions from the infrastructure, related both to initial investments, and to too infrequent retrofits when this emissions level is already too high. An initially excessive climate gas emissions level is then likely to be worsened when volatility increases.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130430090534&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-04-30T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-04-30T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Environment|Transport|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Climate Change Economics|Transport Economics Policy &amp; Planning|Energy Production and Transportation|Environmental Economics &amp; Policies</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Framstad, Nils Christian|Strand, Jon</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Energy intensive infrastructure investments with retrofits in continuous time : effects of uncertainty on energy use and carbon emissions</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Environment|Transport|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Climate Change Economics|Transport Economics Policy &amp; Planning|Energy Production and Transportation|Environmental Economics &amp; Policies</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6430</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">A "greenprint" for international cooperation on climate change</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130513085415&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">International negotiations on climate change have been dogged by mutual recriminations between rich and poor countries, constricted by the zero-sum arithmetic of a shrinking global carbon budget, and overtaken by shifts in economic power between industrialized and developing countries. To overcome these "narrative," "adding-up," and "new world" problems, respectively, this paper proposes a new Greenprint for cooperation. First, the large dynamic emerging economies -- China, India, Brazil, and Indonesia -- must assume the mantle of leadership, offering contributions of their own and prodding the reluctant industrial countries into action. This role reversal would be consistent with the greater stakes for the dynamic emerging economies. Second, the emphasis must be on technology generation. This would allow greater consumption and production possibilities for all countries while respecting the global emissions budget that is dictated by the climate change goal of keeping average temperature rise below 2 degrees centigrade. Third, instead of the old cash-for-cuts approach -- which relies on the industrial countries offering cash (which they do not have) to the dynamic emerging economies for cuts (that they are unwilling to make) -- all major emitters must make contributions. With a view to galvanizing a technology revolution, industrial countries would take early action to raise carbon prices. The dynamic emerging economies would in turn eliminate fossil fuel subsidies, commit to matching carbon price increases in the future, allow limited border taxes against their own exports, and strengthen protection of intellectual property for green technologies. This would directly and indirectly facilitate such a technological revolution.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130513085415&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-05-13T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-05-13T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Climate Change Economics|Environmental Economics &amp; Policies|Energy Production and Transportation|Carbon Policy and Trading</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>East Asia and Pacific|South Asia|Latin America &amp; Caribbean</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Mattoo, Aaditya|Subramanian, Arvind</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>A "greenprint" for international cooperation on climate change</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>China|India|Brazil|Indonesia</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Climate Change Economics|Environmental Economics &amp; Policies|Energy Production and Transportation|Carbon Policy and Trading</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6440</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>China|India|Brazil|Indonesia</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>East Asia and Pacific|South Asia|Latin America &amp; Caribbean</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Drawing a roadmap for oil pricing reform</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130520093401&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">In 2011, the median oil imports rose to 5 percent of gross domestic product for net importers. In the past several years, many governments have not passed through the world oil price increases to consumers fully. As a sign of divergent pricing policies, the retail prices of gasoline, diesel, and cooking gas in January 2013 varied by a factor of 190, 250, and 70, respectively, across developing countries. Policies to keep oil product prices low to benefit the economy and protect the poor have had a number of unintended negative consequences, including flourishing corruption in the oil sector and entrenchment of monopoly operators or inefficient firms through which subsidies are channeled, stifling competition and raising costs. The path to market-based pricing depends on the starting conditions: the gap between current and market-based price levels, the level of public awareness about the extent of departure from market prices, the degree of market concentration and competition in downstream oil, the subsidy delivery mechanism where subsidies are provided, the robustness of social service delivery, and the perceived credibility of the government. The evidence presented in this paper suggests that pricing reform often does not have a clear end and should instead be viewed as a continuous process of adjustment and search for mechanisms that take into account the country's institutions and political system, and the oil sector's market structure, infrastructure, and history.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130520093401&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-05-20T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-05-20T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Private Sector Development|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|International Economics and Trade|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Markets and Market Access|Energy Production and Transportation|Access to Markets|Emerging Markets|Economic Theory &amp; Research</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Kojima, Masami</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Drawing a roadmap for oil pricing reform</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Private Sector Development|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|International Economics and Trade|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Markets and Market Access|Energy Production and Transportation|Access to Markets|Emerging Markets|Economic Theory &amp; Research</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6450</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">The effect of biodiesel policies on world oilseed markets and developing countries</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130520130118&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">Using an empirical model, this study provides some insights into the functioning of the oilseed-biodiesel-diesel market complex in a large country that determines the biodiesel price, reflecting market equilibrium changes resulting from volatility in the crude oil price. Oilseed crushing produces joint products -- oil and meal -- and this weakens the link between the biodiesel and oilseed feedstock prices. Higher crude oil prices increase biodiesel prices if biofuel benefits from a fuel tax exemption, but lower them with a blending mandate (minimum biofuel content requirement in marketed fuel). When both canola and soybeans are used to produce biodiesel, an increase in the crude oil price leads to higher canola prices, but the effect on soybean prices is ambiguous and depends on relative elasticities of meal demand and canola supply because canola produces more oil than soybeans. An oil price shock with a blending mandate results in a smaller change in oilseed prices compared with a fuel tax exemption. Jumps in world crude oil prices have differential impacts on commodity prices and welfare in developing countries, depending on which policy determines the biodiesel price in OECD countries.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130520130118&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-05-20T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-05-20T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Private Sector Development|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Industry|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Energy Production and Transportation|Markets and Market Access|Renewable Energy|Oil Refining &amp; Gas Industry|Emerging Markets</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>de Gorter, Harry|Drabik, Dusan|Timilsina, Govinda R.</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>The effect of biodiesel policies on world oilseed markets and developing countries</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Private Sector Development|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Industry|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Energy Production and Transportation|Markets and Market Access|Renewable Energy|Oil Refining &amp; Gas Industry|Emerging Markets</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6453</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Long-term drivers of food prices</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130521131725&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">It is becoming increasingly apparent that the post-2004, across-the-board, commodity price increases, which initially appeared to be a spike similar to the ones experienced during the early 1950s (Korean War) and the 1970s (oil crises), have a more permanent character. From 1997-2004 to 2005-12 nominal prices of energy, fertilizers, and precious metals tripled, metal prices went up by more than 150 percent, and most food prices doubled. Such price increases, especially in food commodities, not only fueled a debate on their key causes, but also alarmed government officials, leading to calls for coordinated policy actions. This paper examines the relative contribution of various sector and macroeconomic drivers to price changes of five food commodities (maize, wheat, rice, soybeans, and palm oil) by applying a reduced-form econometric model on 1960-2012 annual data. The drivers include stock-to-use ratios, crude oil and manufacturing prices, the United States dollar exchange rate, interest rate, and income. Based on long-run elasticity estimates (approximately -0.25 for the stock-to-use ratios, 0.25 for the oil price, -1.25 for the exchange rate, and much less for others), the paper estimates the contribution of these drivers to food price increases from 1997-2004 to 2005-12. It concludes that most of the price increases are accounted for by crude oil prices (more than 50 percent), followed by stock-to-use ratios and exchange rate movements, which are estimated at about 15 percent each. Crude oil prices mattered most during the recent boom period because they experienced the largest increase.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130521131725&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-05-21T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-05-21T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Private Sector Development|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Industry|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Markets and Market Access|Emerging Markets|Food &amp; Beverage Industry|Climate Change Economics|Energy Production and Transportation</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Baffes, John|Dennis, Allen</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Long-term drivers of food prices</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Private Sector Development|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Industry|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Markets and Market Access|Emerging Markets|Food &amp; Beverage Industry|Climate Change Economics|Energy Production and Transportation</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6455</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Political determinants of fossil fuel pricing</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130531103221&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">This paper provides an empirical analysis of economic and political determinants of gasoline and diesel prices for about 200 countries over the period 1991-2010. A range of both political and economic variables are found to systematically influence fuel prices, and in ways that differ systematically with countries per-capita income levels. For democracies, the analysis finds that fuel prices correlate positively with both duration of democracy and tenure of democratic leaders. In non-democratic societies there is more often no such relationship or it is the opposite of that for democracies. Regime switches -- transitions from non-democratic to democratic government, or vice versa -- reduce fuel prices. Fuel prices are also lower for more corrupt, or more centralized, governments. Higher levels of gross domestic product per capita lead to higher fuel prices, while export income from selling fossil fuels reduces these prices dramatically. Higher motor fuel consumption also appears to reduce fuel prices, most for gasoline. Absolute "pass-through" of crude oil price changes to fuel prices is found to be high on average. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130531103221&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-05-31T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-05-31T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Transport|Private Sector Development|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Energy Production and Transportation|Transport Economics Policy &amp; Planning|Economic Theory &amp; Research|Emerging Markets|Transport and Environment</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>van Beers, Cees|Strand, Jon</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Political determinants of fossil fuel pricing</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Transport|Private Sector Development|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Energy Production and Transportation|Transport Economics Policy &amp; Planning|Economic Theory &amp; Research|Emerging Markets|Transport and Environment</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6470</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">China: west or east wind -- getting the incentives right</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130617105119&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">With rapid development of wind power in China, the following three issues have become barriers for further scale-up: 1) concentration of wind farms in the Three-North region, which became significantly underutilized because of a limited capability of local power grids to off-take and consume wind-generated electricity and because of a lack of coordinated development of long-distance transmission lines to deliver electricity to load centers in the South and East regions; 2) increasing subsidies and, thus, a burden on final consumers; and 3) resistance of local authorities to develop new projects because the new value added tax policy reform. How to deal with these issues will have significant impact on the future development of wind in China. This note proposes a methodology to enhance a comprehensive approach by taking both generation and transmission into account in crafting the development plan and formulating the incentive policies, which may be useful in addressing these issues.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130617105119&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-06-17T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-06-17T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Environment|Energy|Science and Technology Development</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Energy Production and Transportation|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Carbon Policy and Trading|Windpower|Science of Climate Change</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>East Asia and Pacific</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Song, Yanqin|Berrah, Noureddine</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>China: west or east wind -- getting the incentives right</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>China</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Environment|Energy|Science and Technology Development</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Energy Production and Transportation|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Carbon Policy and Trading|Windpower|Science of Climate Change</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6486</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>China</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>East Asia and Pacific</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Multidimensional auctions for public energy efficiency projects : evidence from the Japanese ESCO market</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130617102044&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">Competitive bidding is an important policy tool to procure goods and services from the market at the lowest possible cost. Under traditional public procurement systems, however, it may be difficult to purchase highly customized objects, such as energy efficiency services. This is because not only prices but also other nonmonetary aspects need to be taken into account. Multidimensional auctions are often used to evaluate multidimensional bids. This paper examines the bidding strategy in multidimensional auctions, using data from public energy service company projects in Japan. It shows that multidimensional auctions work well, as theory predicts. The competition effect is significant. In addition, strategic information disclosure, including walk-through and preannouncement of reserve prices, can also promote energy savings and investment. Risk sharing arrangements are critical in the energy service company market. In particular, the public sector should take regulatory risk. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130617102044&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-06-17T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-06-17T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy|Finance and Financial Sector Development</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Energy Production and Transportation|Climate Change Economics|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Debt Markets|Energy Demand</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>East Asia and Pacific</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Iimi, Atsushi</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Multidimensional auctions for public energy efficiency projects : evidence from the Japanese ESCO market</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>Japan</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Environment|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Energy|Finance and Financial Sector Development</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Energy Production and Transportation|Climate Change Economics|Climate Change Mitigation and Green House Gases|Debt Markets|Energy Demand</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6485</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>Japan</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>East Asia and Pacific</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Technological learning, energy efficiency, and CO2 emissions in China's energy intensive industries</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130618132914&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy"></link><summary type="html">Since the onset of economic reforms in 1978, China has been remarkably successful in reducing the carbon dioxide intensities of gross domestic product and industrial production. Most analysts correctly attribute the rapid decline in the carbon dioxide intensity of industrial production to rising energy prices, increased openness to trade and investment, increased competition, and technological change. China's industrial and technology policies also have contributed to lower carbon dioxide intensities, by transforming industrial structure and improving enterprise level technological capabilities. Case studies of four energy intensive industries -- aluminum, cement, iron and steel, and paper -- show how the changes have put these industries on substantially lower carbon dioxide emissions trajectories. Although the changes have not led to absolute declines in carbon dioxide emissions, they have substantially weakened the link between industry growth and carbon dioxide emissions. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130618132914&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Energy&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Energy" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-06-18T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-06-18T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Environment|Information and Communication Technologies|Industry|Energy</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Energy Production and Transportation|Technology Industry|ICT Policy and Strategies|Environmental Economics &amp; Policies|Energy and Environment</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>East Asia and Pacific</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Rock, Michael T.|Toman, Michael|Cui, Yuanshang|Jiang, Kejun|Song, Yun|Wang, Yanjia</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Technological learning, energy efficiency, and CO2 emissions in China's energy intensive industries</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>China</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Environment|Information and Communication Technologies|Industry|Energy</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Energy Production and Transportation|Technology Industry|ICT Policy and Strategies|Environmental Economics &amp; Policies|Energy and Environment</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6492</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>China</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>East Asia and Pacific</wbfeed:regions></entry></feed>