<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:wbfeed="http://www.worldbank.org/isp/"><wbfeed:name>Gender</wbfeed:name><wbfeed:date>Thu May 23 19:00:19 EDT 2013</wbfeed:date><wbfeed:host>w1es1000.worldbank.org</wbfeed:host><title type="text">Policy Research Working Paper | Gender | World Bank</title><link href="http://econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/0,,menuPK:577938~pagePK:64165265~piPK:64165423~theSitePK:469372,00.html"></link><subtitle type="html">Policy Research Working Paper on Gender, from the World Bank</subtitle><entry><title type="text">What explains big gender disparities in India ? local industrial structures and female entrepreneurship</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20121015135312&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">Despite rapid economic growth, gender disparities in women's economic participation have remained deep and persistent in India. What explains these huge gender disparities? Is it poor infrastructure, limited education, and gender composition of the labor force and industries? Or is it deficiencies in social and business networks and a low share of incumbent female entrepreneurs?This paper analyzes the spatial determinants of female entrepreneurship in India in the manufacturing and services sectors. Good infrastructure and education predict higher female entry shares. There are strong agglomeration economies in both manufacturing and services, where higher female ownership among incumbent businesses within a district-industry predicts a greater share of subsequent entrepreneurs will be female. Moreover, higher female ownership of local businesses in related industries (similar labor needs, input-output markets) predicts greater relative female entry rates. Gender networks thus clearly matter for women's economic participation. However, there is a need to develop a better understanding of how gender networks influence aggregate efficiency. There is no doubt that gender empowerment can be the escalator to realizing human potential and for creating a robust platform for growth and job creation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20121015135312&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2012-10-15T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2012-10-15T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Private Sector Development|Gender|Water Resources|Finance and Financial Sector Development|Communities and Human Settlements</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Banks &amp; Banking Reform|Housing &amp; Human Habitats|Water and Industry|E-Business|Gender and Law</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>South Asia</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Ghani, Ejaz|Kerr, William R.|O'Connell, Stephen D.</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>What explains big gender disparities in India ? local industrial structures and female entrepreneurship</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>India</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Private Sector Development|Gender|Water Resources|Finance and Financial Sector Development|Communities and Human Settlements</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Banks &amp; Banking Reform|Housing &amp; Human Habitats|Water and Industry|E-Business|Gender and Law</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6228</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>India</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>South Asia</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Empowering women : evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20121119142938&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">In societies with widespread gender discrimination, development programs that encourage female participation in local governance can potentially redress gender imbalances in economic, political, and social outcomes. Using a randomized field experiment encompassing 500 Afghan villages, this study finds that a development program which incorporates mandated female participation increases female mobility and involvement in income generation, but does not change female roles in family decision-making or attitudes toward the general role of women in society.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20121119142938&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2012-11-19T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2012-11-19T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Culture and Development|Gender|Communities and Human Settlements</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Gender and Law|Gender and Health|Housing &amp; Human Habitats|Anthropology|Gender and Development</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>South Asia</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Beath, Andrew|Christia, Fotini|Enikolopov, Ruben</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Empowering women : evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>Afghanistan</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Culture and Development|Gender|Communities and Human Settlements</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Gender and Law|Gender and Health|Housing &amp; Human Habitats|Anthropology|Gender and Development</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6269</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>Afghanistan</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>South Asia</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">The role of men in the economic and social development of women : implications for gender equality</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130117110200&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">This paper is a critical review of the literature on the issue of how male behavior affects female outcomes in the promotion of gender equality. It employs the family as the main unit of analysis because a large part of gender interactions occurs within this institution. This survey first summarizes recent studies on the distribution of power within the family and identifies several factors that have altered the bargaining position of men and women over the last decades. It then reviews empirical work on the contribution of men, as fathers and husbands, to the health and socioeconomic outcomes of women in both developed and developing countries. Finally, it discusses a set of economic policies that have intentionally or unintentionally affected men's attitudes and behaviors. The main implication is that policies meant to achieve gender equality should focus on men rather than exclusively target women. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130117110200&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-01-17T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-01-17T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Population Policies|Gender and Development|Gender and Law|Gender and Health|Health Monitoring &amp; Evaluation</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Farre, Lidia</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>The role of men in the economic and social development of women : implications for gender equality</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Population Policies|Gender and Development|Gender and Law|Gender and Health|Health Monitoring &amp; Evaluation</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6323</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Intrahousehold bargaining and resource allocation in developing countries</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130123160408&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">Many key development outcomes depend on women's ability to negotiate favorable intrahousehold allocations of resources. Yet it has been difficult to clearly identify which policies can increase women's bargaining power and result in better outcomes. This paper reviews both the analytical frameworks and the empirical evidence on the importance of women's bargaining power. It argues that there is sufficient evidence from rigorous studies to conclude that women's bargaining power does affect outcomes. But in many specific instances, the quantitative evidence cannot rigorously identify causality. In these cases, a combination of quantitative and qualitative evidence may suggest policy levers. Taken together, there are sufficient data in place to support a greatly expanded focus on intrahousehold outcomes and bargaining power. Additional data at the individual level will allow for further and more detailed research. A growing literature supports the current conventional wisdom -- namely, that the patterns of evidence suggest that women's education, incomes, and assets all are important aspects of women's bargaining power.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130123160408&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-01-23T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-01-23T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Culture and Development|Gender|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Social Protections and Labor|Rural Development</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Labor Policies|Rural Development Knowledge &amp; Information Systems|Anthropology|Gender and Law|Economic Theory &amp; Research</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Doss, Cheryl</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Intrahousehold bargaining and resource allocation in developing countries</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Culture and Development|Gender|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Social Protections and Labor|Rural Development</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Labor Policies|Rural Development Knowledge &amp; Information Systems|Anthropology|Gender and Law|Economic Theory &amp; Research</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6337</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Children's health opportunities and project evaluation : Mexico's Oportunidades program</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130130151304&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">This paper proposes a methodology to evaluate social projects from the perspective of children's opportunities on the basis of the effects of these projects on the distribution of outcomes. The evaluation is conditioned on characteristics for which individuals are not responsible; in this case, parental education level and indigenous background. The methodology is applied to evaluate the effects on children's health opportunities of Mexico's Oportunidades program, one of the largest conditional cash transfer programs for poor households in the world. The evidence from this program shows that gains in health opportunities for children from indigenous backgrounds are substantial and are situated in crucial parts of the distribution, whereas gains for children from nonindigenous backgrounds are more limited.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130130151304&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-01-30T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-01-30T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Gender|Urban Development|Health, Nutrition and Population|Education</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Health Monitoring &amp; Evaluation|Disease Control &amp; Prevention|Gender and Law|Primary Education|Street Children</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>Latin America &amp; Caribbean</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Van de gaer,  Dirk|Vandenbossche, Joost|Figueroa, Jose Luis</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Children's health opportunities and project evaluation : Mexico's Oportunidades program</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>Mexico</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Gender|Urban Development|Health, Nutrition and Population|Education</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Health Monitoring &amp; Evaluation|Disease Control &amp; Prevention|Gender and Law|Primary Education|Street Children</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6345</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>Mexico</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>Latin America &amp; Caribbean</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">How subjective beliefs about HIV infection affect life-cycle fertility : evidence from rural Malawi</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130130110631&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">This paper studies the effect of subjective beliefs about HIV infection on fertility decisions in a context of high HIV prevalence and simulates the impact of different policy interventions, such as HIV testing programs and prevention of mother-to-child transmission, on fertility and child mortality. It develops a model of women's life-cycle, in which women make sequential fertility decisions. Expectations about the life horizon and child survival depend on women's perceived exposure to HIV infection, which is allowed to differ from the actual exposure. In the model, women form beliefs about their HIV status and about their own and their children's survival in future periods. Women update their beliefs with survival to each additional period as well as when their HIV status is revealed by an HIV test. Model parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood with longitudinal data from the Malawi Diffusion and Ideational Change Project, which contain family rosters, information on HIV testing, and measures of subjective beliefs about own HIV status. The model successfully fits the fertility patterns in the data, as well as the distribution of reported beliefs about own HIV status. The analysis uses the model to assess the effect of HIV on fertility by simulating behavior in an environment without HIV. The results show that the presence of HIV reduces the average number of births a woman has during her life-cycle by 0.15. The paper also finds that HIV testing can reduce the fertility of infected women, leading to a reduction of child mortality and orphan-hood.  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130130110631&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-01-30T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-01-30T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Population Policies|Gender and Health|Disease Control &amp; Prevention|Gender and Law|Adolescent Health</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>Africa</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Shapira, Gil</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>How subjective beliefs about HIV infection affect life-cycle fertility : evidence from rural Malawi</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>Malawi</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Population Policies|Gender and Health|Disease Control &amp; Prevention|Gender and Law|Adolescent Health</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6343</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>Malawi</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>Africa</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Is foreign aid fungible ? evidence from the education and health sectors</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130130151950&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">This paper adopts a new approach to the issue of foreign aid fungibility. In contrast to most existing empirical studies, panel data are employed that contain information on the specific purposes for which aid is given. This allows linking aid that is provided for education and health purposes to recipient public spending in these sectors. In addition, aid flows that are recorded on a recipient's budget are distinguished from those that are not recorded on budget, and the previous failure to differentiate between on- and off-budget aid is shown to produce biased estimates of fungibility. Sector program aid is the measure of on-budget aid, whereas technical cooperation serves as a proxy for off-budget aid. The appropriate treatment of off-budget aid leads to lower fungibility estimates than those reported in many previous studies. Specifically, in both sectors and across a range of specifications, technical cooperation, which is the largest component of total education and health aid, leads to, at most, a small displacement of recipient public expenditures.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130130151950&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-01-30T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-01-30T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Public Sector Development|Gender|Social Protections and Labor|Health, Nutrition and Population|Finance and Financial Sector Development</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Health Monitoring &amp; Evaluation|Gender and Health|Public Sector Expenditure Policy|Disability|Debt Markets</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Van de Sijpe, Nicolas</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Is foreign aid fungible ? evidence from the education and health sectors</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Public Sector Development|Gender|Social Protections and Labor|Health, Nutrition and Population|Finance and Financial Sector Development</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Health Monitoring &amp; Evaluation|Gender and Health|Public Sector Expenditure Policy|Disability|Debt Markets</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6346</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Political reservations and women's entrepreneurship in India</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130213081317&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">This paper quantifies the link between the timing of state-level implementations of political reservations for women in India with the role of women in India's manufacturing sector. It does not find evidence that overall employment of women in manufacturing increased after the reforms. However, the analysis finds significant evidence that more women-owned establishments were created in the unorganized/informal sector. These establishments were concentrated in industries where women entrepreneurs have been traditionally active and the entry was mainly found among household-based establishments. This heightened entrepreneurship does not appear linked to changes in reporting, better access to government contracts and business, or improved financing environments. One interpretation of these results is that the implementation of the political reservations inspired more women to open establishments, and they did so at a small establishment scale in industries where they had experience and/or the support networks of other women. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130213081317&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-02-13T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-02-13T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Gender|Water Resources|Finance and Financial Sector Development</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Access to Finance|Gender and Development|Water and Industry|Gender and Law|Gender and Health</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>South Asia</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Ghani, Ejaz|Kerr, William R.|O'Connell, Stephen D.</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Political reservations and women's entrepreneurship in India</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>India</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Gender|Water Resources|Finance and Financial Sector Development</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Access to Finance|Gender and Development|Water and Industry|Gender and Law|Gender and Health</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6307</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>India</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>South Asia</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Does a wife's bargaining power provide more micronutrients to females : evidence from rural Bangladesh</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130219110837&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">Using calories in a unitary framework, previous literature has claimed lack of gender inequality in intrahousehold food distribution. This paper finds that while there is lack of gender disparity in the calorie adequacy ratio, the disparity is prominent among children, adolescents, and adults for a number of critical nutrients. Pregnant and lactating women also receive much less of most of these nutrients compared with their requirements. A wife's bargaining power (proxied by assets at marriage), as opposed to her husband's, significantly and positively affects the nutrient allocations of children and adolescents and of adult females. The bargaining effects remain significant after controlling for unobserved household characteristics and the potential nutrition-health-labor market linkage. The findings, which have important policy implications for the growing problem of micronutrient malnutrition in the developing world, also imply that perhaps the nutrition-health-labor market linkage as a key explanation for intrahousehold food distribution has been overemphasized in the previous literature.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130219110837&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-02-19T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-02-19T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population|Communities and Human Settlements</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Health Monitoring &amp; Evaluation|Nutrition|Population Policies|Housing &amp; Human Habitats|Gender and Health</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>South Asia</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Rahman, Aminur</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Does a wife's bargaining power provide more micronutrients to females : evidence from rural Bangladesh</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>Bangladesh</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population|Communities and Human Settlements</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Health Monitoring &amp; Evaluation|Nutrition|Population Policies|Housing &amp; Human Habitats|Gender and Health</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6363</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>Bangladesh</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>South Asia</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Does gender inequality hinder development and economic growth ? evidence and policy implications</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130221100323&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">Does the existing evidence support policies that foster growth by reducing gender inequality? The authors argue that the evidence based on differences across countries is of limited use for policy design because it does not identify the causal link from inequality to growth. This, however does not imply that inequality-reducing policies are ineffective. In other words, the lack of evidence of a causal link is not in itself evidence that the causal link does not exist. Detailed micro studies that shed light on the mechanisms through which gender inequality affects development and growth are needed to inform the design of effective policies.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130221100323&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-02-21T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-02-21T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population|Poverty Reduction</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Gender and Development|Population Policies|Gender and Law|Gender and Health|Achieving Shared Growth</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Bandiera, Oriana|Natraj, Ashwini</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Does gender inequality hinder development and economic growth ? evidence and policy implications</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population|Poverty Reduction</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Gender and Development|Population Policies|Gender and Law|Gender and Health|Achieving Shared Growth</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6369</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Gender and agriculture : inefficiencies, segregation, and low productivity traps</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130221150818&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">Women make essential contributions to agriculture in developing countries, where they constitute approximately 43 percent of the agricultural labor force. However, female farmers typically have lower output per unit of land and are much less likely to be active in commercial farming than their male counterparts. These gender differences in land productivity and participation between male and female farmers are due to gender differences in access to inputs, resources, and services. In this paper, the authors review the evidence on productivity differences and access to resources. They discuss some of the reasons for these differences, such as differences in property rights, education, control over resources (e.g., land), access to inputs and services (e.g., fertilizer, extension, and credit), and social norms. Although women are less active in commercial farming and are largely excluded from contract farming, they often provide the bulk of wage labor in the nontraditional export sector. In general, gender gaps do not appear to fall systematically with growth, and they appear to rise with GDP per capita and with greater access to resources and inputs. Active policies that support women's access and participation, not just greater overall access, are essential if these gaps are to be closed. The gains in terms of greater productivity of land and overall production are likely to be large.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130221150818&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-02-21T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-02-21T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Culture and Development|Gender|Rural Development</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Rural Development Knowledge &amp; Information Systems|Gender and Health|Gender and Law|Gender and Development|Anthropology</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Croppenstedt, Andre|Goldstein, Markus|Rosas, Nina</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Gender and agriculture : inefficiencies, segregation, and low productivity traps</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Culture and Development|Gender|Rural Development</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Rural Development Knowledge &amp; Information Systems|Gender and Health|Gender and Law|Gender and Development|Anthropology</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6370</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Violent conflict and gender inequality : an overview</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130221132422&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">Violent conflict, a pervasive feature of the recent global landscape, has lasting impacts on human capital, and these impacts are seldom gender neutral. Death and destruction alter the structure and dynamics of households, including their demographic profiles and traditional gender roles. To date, attention to the gender impacts of conflict has focused almost exclusively on sexual and gender-based violence. The authors show that a far wider set of gender issues must be considered to better document the human consequences of war and to design effective postconflict policies. The emerging empirical evidence is organized using a framework that identifies both the differential impacts of violent conflict on males and females (first-round impacts) and the role of gender inequality in framing adaptive responses to conflict (second-round impacts). War's mortality burden is disproportionately borne by males, whereas women and children constitute a majority of refugees and the displaced. Indirect war impacts on health are more equally distributed between the genders. Conflicts create households headed by widows who can be especially vulnerable to intergenerational poverty. Second-round impacts can provide opportunities for women in work and politics triggered by the absence of men. Households adapt to conflict with changes in marriage and fertility, migration, investments in children's health and schooling, and the distribution of labor between the genders. The impacts of conflict are heterogeneous and can either increase or decrease preexisting gender inequalities. Describing these gender differential effects is a first step toward developing evidence-based conflict prevention and postconflict policy. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130221132422&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-02-21T05:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-02-21T05:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Conflict and Development|Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Health Monitoring &amp; Evaluation|Population Policies|Post Conflict Reconstruction|Gender and Development|Gender and Health</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Buvinic, Mayra|Das Gupta, Monica|Casabonne, Ursula|Verwimp, Philip</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Violent conflict and gender inequality : an overview</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Conflict and Development|Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Health Monitoring &amp; Evaluation|Population Policies|Post Conflict Reconstruction|Gender and Development|Gender and Health</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6371</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Caught in a productivity trap: a distributional perspective on gender differences in Malawian agriculture</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130311112435&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">In targeting poverty gains, sub-Saharan African governments have emphasized the alleviation of gender differences in agricultural productivity. The empirical studies on the gender gap, however, have frequently used data that were limited regarding geographic and topical coverage, and/or details on intra-household dynamics. The study provides a nationally-representative analysis of the gender gap in Malawi, and decomposes it, for the first time, at the mean and at selected points of the agricultural productivity distribution into (i) a portion driven by gender differences in levels of observable attributes (the endowment effect), and (ii) a portion driven by gender differences in returns to the same set of observables (the structure effect). Sequentially, the authors unpack the relative contributions of different factors towards the gender gap, and suggest future research priorities to inform policy interventions. The authors find that while female-managed plots are, on average, 25 percent less productive, 82 percent of this differential is explained by differences in endowments, mainly due to high-value crop cultivation and levels of household adult male labor inputs. The factors driving the structure effect include child dependency ratio and effectiveness of household adult male labor and inorganic fertilizer. The gender gap increases across the productivity distribution, ranging from 22 percent at the 10th percentile to 37 percent at the 90th percentile. While it is explained predominantly by the endowment effect in the first half of the distribution, the contribution of the structure effect towards the gender gap increases steadily above the median, standing at 34 percent at the 90th percentile. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130311112435&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-03-11T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-03-11T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Gender|Rural Development|Communities and Human Settlements</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Gender and Development|Housing &amp; Human Habitats|Gender and Health|Rural Development Knowledge &amp; Information Systems|Gender and Law</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>Africa</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Kilic, Talip|Palacios-Lopez, Amparo|Goldstein, Markus</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Caught in a productivity trap: a distributional perspective on gender differences in Malawian agriculture</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>Malawi</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Gender|Rural Development|Communities and Human Settlements</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Gender and Development|Housing &amp; Human Habitats|Gender and Health|Rural Development Knowledge &amp; Information Systems|Gender and Law</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6381</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>Malawi</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>Africa</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Gender equality and economic growth in Brazil : a long-run analysis</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130328100146&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">This paper studies the long-run impact of policies aimed at fostering gender equality on economic growth in Brazil. The first part provides a brief review of gender issues in the country. The second part presents a gender-based, three-period OLG model that accounts for women's time allocation between market work, child rearing, human capital accumulation, and home production. Bargaining between spouses depends on relative human capital stocks, and thus indirectly on access to infrastructure. The model is calibrated and various experiments are conducted, including investment in infrastructure, conditional cash transfers, a reduction in gender bias in the market place, and a composite pro-growth, pro-gender reform program. The analysis showed that fostering gender equality, which may partly depend on the externalities that infrastructure creates in terms of women's time allocation and bargaining power, may have a substantial impact on long-run growth in Brazil.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130328100146&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-03-28T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-03-28T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Gender|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Social Protections and Labor|Health, Nutrition and Population</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Health Monitoring &amp; Evaluation|Population Policies|Economic Theory &amp; Research|Gender and Law|Labor Policies</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>Latin America &amp; Caribbean</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Agenor, Pierre-Richard|Canuto, Otaviano</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Gender equality and economic growth in Brazil : a long-run analysis</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>Brazil</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Gender|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Social Protections and Labor|Health, Nutrition and Population</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Health Monitoring &amp; Evaluation|Population Policies|Economic Theory &amp; Research|Gender and Law|Labor Policies</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6348</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>Brazil</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>Latin America &amp; Caribbean</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Measuring the effect of a community-level program on women's empowerment outcomes : evidence from India</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130404085232&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">This paper uses primary data from rural north India to show that participation in a community-level female empowerment program significantly increases access to employment, physical mobility, and political participation. The program provides support groups, literacy camps, adult education classes, and vocational training for rural women in several states of India; the data are from Uttarakhand. The paper uses instrumental variables and truncation-corrected matching on primary data to disentangle the program's mechanisms, separately considering its effect on women who work, and those who do not work but whose reservation wage is increased by participation. The analysis also finds significant spillover effects on non-participants relative to women in untreated districts. It finds consistent estimates for average treatment and intent to treat effects&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130404085232&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-04-04T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-04-04T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Culture and Development|Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population|Social Development|Education</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Gender and Law|Population Policies|Primary Education|Social Accountability|Anthropology</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>South Asia</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Kandpal, Eeshani|Baylis, Kathy|Arends-Kuenning, Mary</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Measuring the effect of a community-level program on women's empowerment outcomes : evidence from India</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>India</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Culture and Development|Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population|Social Development|Education</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Gender and Law|Population Policies|Primary Education|Social Accountability|Anthropology</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6399</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>India</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>South Asia</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Financial inclusion and legal discrimination against women : evidence from developing countries</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130419105349&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">This paper documents and analyzes gender differences in the use of financial services using individual-level data from 98 developing countries. The data, drawn from the Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) database, highlight the existence of significant gender gaps in ownership of accounts and usage of savings and credit products. Even after controlling for a host of individual characteristics including income, education, employment status, rural residency and age, gender remains significantly related to usage of financial services. This study also finds that legal discrimination against women and gender norms may explain some of the cross-country variation in access to finance for women. The analysis finds that in countries where women face legal restrictions in their ability to work, head a household, choose where to live, and receive inheritance, women are less likely to own an account, relative to men, as well as to save and borrow. The results also confirm that manifestations of gender norms, such as the level of violence against women and the incidence of early marriage for women, contribute to explaining the variation in the use of financial services between men and women, after controlling for other individual and country characteristics.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130419105349&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-04-19T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-04-19T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population|Finance and Financial Sector Development</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Access to Finance|Gender and Law|Financial Literacy|Gender and Development|Population Policies</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Demirguc-Kunt, Asli|Klapper, Leora|Singer, Dorothe</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Financial inclusion and legal discrimination against women : evidence from developing countries</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Gender|Health, Nutrition and Population|Finance and Financial Sector Development</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Access to Finance|Gender and Law|Financial Literacy|Gender and Development|Population Policies</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6416</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Building or bypassing recipient country systems : are donors defying the Paris declaration ?</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130423150349&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">The 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness sets targets for increased use by donors of recipient country systems for managing aid. It also calls for donors to be more responsive to the quality of recipient country systems: the optimal level of their use, in terms of maximizing the development effectiveness of aid, is believed to vary with their quality. This study investigates the degree to which donors' use of country systems is in fact positively related to their quality, using indicators explicitly endorsed for this purpose by the Paris Declaration and covering the 2005-2010 period. The results of these tests strongly confirm a positive and significant relationship, and show it is robust to corrections for potential sample selection, omitted variables, or endogeneity bias. The result holds even when estimates are informed only by variation over time within each donor-recipient pair in use and quality of country systems. Moreover, donor-specific tests show that use of country systems varies positively with their quality for the vast majority of donors. These findings contradict several other studies that claim there is no relation and imply that donors in this respect are failing to live up to their commitments under the Paris Declaration. The author's interpretation of the available evidence on use of country systems is more favorable: donors' behavior over the measurement period is largely consistent with their commitments in this area. In this respect, at least, donors appear to have modified their aid practices in ways that build rather than undermine administrative capacity and accountability in recipient country governments.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130423150349&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-04-23T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-04-23T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Gender|Public Sector Development|Industry|Poverty Reduction|Finance and Financial Sector Development</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Technology Industry|Gender and Health|Poverty Monitoring &amp; Analysis|Microfinance|Public Sector Expenditure Policy</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Knack, Stephen</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Building or bypassing recipient country systems : are donors defying the Paris declaration ?</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Gender|Public Sector Development|Industry|Poverty Reduction|Finance and Financial Sector Development</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Technology Industry|Gender and Health|Poverty Monitoring &amp; Analysis|Microfinance|Public Sector Expenditure Policy</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6423</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">Foreign wage premium, gender and education : insights from Vietnam household surveys</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130424104202&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">This paper investigates the differential impacts of foreign ownership on wages for different types of workers (in terms of educational background and gender) in Vietnam using the Vietnam Household Living Standards Surveys of 2002 and 2004. Whereas most previous studies have compared wage levels between foreign and domestic sectors using firm-level data (thus excluding the informal sector), one advantage of using the Living Standards Surveys in this paper is that the data allow wage comparison analyses to extend to the informal wage sector. A series of Mincerian earnings equations and worker-specific fixed effects models are estimated. Several findings emerge. First, foreign firms pay higher wages relative to their domestic counterparts after controlling for workers personal characteristics. Second, the higher the individual workers' levels of education, the larger on average are the wage premiums for those who work for foreign firms. Third, longer hours of work in foreign firm jobs relative to working in the informal wage sector are an important component of the wage premium. Finally, unskilled women experience a larger foreign wage premium than unskilled men, reflecting the low earning opportunities for women and a higher gender gap in the informal wage sector.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130424104202&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-04-24T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-04-24T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Gender|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Social Protections and Labor|Finance and Financial Sector Development</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Labor Markets|Labor Policies|Economic Theory &amp; Research|Gender and Development|Bankruptcy and Resolution of Financial Distress</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>East Asia and Pacific</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Fukase, Emiko</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>Foreign wage premium, gender and education : insights from Vietnam household surveys</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>Vietnam</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Gender|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Social Protections and Labor|Finance and Financial Sector Development</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Labor Markets|Labor Policies|Economic Theory &amp; Research|Gender and Development|Bankruptcy and Resolution of Financial Distress</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6421</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>Vietnam</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>East Asia and Pacific</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">A model of gendered production in colonial Africa and implications for development in the post-colonial period</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130508154842&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">This paper proposes a model to analyze the implications of colonial policies for gender inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa. The model emphasizes segmentation of production under complete specialization. It shows that the colonial production model, underpinned by occupational job segregation in the agricultural sector and gender bias in the non-agricultural sector, exacerbated gender inequality by limiting employment opportunities for women outside the realm of home production and subsistence agriculture. Over the past few decades, the resilience of parameters underlying these models of colonial production has heightened the risks of macroeconomic volatility in the region, especially where the structural transformation from low to high-value-added activities has remained elusive.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130508154842&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-05-08T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-05-08T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Gender|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Social Protections and Labor|Health, Nutrition and Population|Rural Development</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Economic Theory &amp; Research|Labor Policies|Rural Development Knowledge &amp; Information Systems|Gender and Development|Population Policies</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>Africa</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Fofack, Hippolyte</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>A model of gendered production in colonial Africa and implications for development in the post-colonial period</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>Africa</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Gender|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Social Protections and Labor|Health, Nutrition and Population|Rural Development</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Economic Theory &amp; Research|Labor Policies|Rural Development Knowledge &amp; Information Systems|Gender and Development|Population Policies</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6438</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>Africa</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>Africa</wbfeed:regions></entry><entry><title type="text">The inequality possibility frontier :  extensions and new applications</title><link href="http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&amp;piPK=64187937&amp;theSitePK=523679&amp;menuPK=64187510&amp;searchMenuPK=64187511&amp;entityID=000158349_20130517111945&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender"></link><summary type="html">This paper extends the Inequality Possibility Frontier approach in two methodological directions. It allows the social minimum to increase with the average income of a society, and it derives all the Inequality Possibility Frontier statistics for two other inequality measures besides the Gini. Finally, it applies the framework to contemporary data, showing that the inequality extraction ratio can be used in the empirical analysis of post-1960 civil conflict around the world. The duration of conflict and the casualty rate are positively associated with the inequality extraction ratio, that is, with the extent to which elite pushes the actual inequality closer to its maximum level. Inequality, albeit slightly reformulated, is thus shown to play a role in explaining civil conflict. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wbws.worldbank.org/feeds/main/tracker.html?p=000158349_20130517111945&amp;db=doc&amp;feedName=Gender&amp;feedClass=NOT_DEFINED&amp;cid=3001_DECwps_Gender" height=1 width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary><published>2013-05-17T04:00:00.000Z</published><updated>2013-05-17T04:00:00.000Z</updated><wbfeed:teraTopics>Gender|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Poverty Reduction</wbfeed:teraTopics><wbfeed:subTopics>Inequality|Poverty Impact Evaluation|Services &amp; Transfers to Poor|Economic Theory &amp; Research|Gender and Law</wbfeed:subTopics><wbfeed:ADMREG>The World Region</wbfeed:ADMREG><wbfeed:AUTHR>Milanovic, Branko</wbfeed:AUTHR><wbfeed:DOCNA>The inequality possibility frontier :  extensions and new applications</wbfeed:DOCNA><wbfeed:LANG>English</wbfeed:LANG><wbfeed:COUNT>World</wbfeed:COUNT><wbfeed:TERATOPIC>Gender|Macroeconomics and Economic Growth|Poverty Reduction</wbfeed:TERATOPIC><wbfeed:SUBTOPIC>Inequality|Poverty Impact Evaluation|Services &amp; Transfers to Poor|Economic Theory &amp; Research|Gender and Law</wbfeed:SUBTOPIC><wbfeed:REPNB>WPS6449</wbfeed:REPNB><wbfeed:countries>World</wbfeed:countries><wbfeed:languages>English</wbfeed:languages><wbfeed:DOCTY>Policy Research Working Paper</wbfeed:DOCTY><wbfeed:regions>The World Region</wbfeed:regions></entry></feed>